Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor

[Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>]

Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com> writes:

> Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> 
> >Maybe we should have such a process; maybe not.  But regardless, the
> >current process allows each individual developer that judgment.

> All Debian process is a result of having a problem, and not having a
> process. The problem in this case is that a lot of people think they
> know what's right, but have not walked through all of the implications
> and distilled it to process, and aren't interested in doing that work.

And, if you aren't interested in doing that work either, then that's
that.  If nobody is interested in it, then it won't happen.  And
that's the *right* thing.

If you are interested, then do it, instead of bitching about other
people who are using the process we do have.