[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor



>>>>> "Russell" == Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> writes:

    Russell> As an example see some of the books of advice for
    Russell> pregnant women.  They have LOTS of photos of nudity
    Russell> including nipples and public hair.  Women seem to buy
    Russell> such books in quantity.

>From time to time they even have naked photos on broadcasted shows
too. Sorry, I can't remember all the ratings now.  I suspect one show
was G (General), or similar (science show aimed at teenagers).

What is scary is that I have all these nude photos on my website of
some friends. Included is one bitch (hmmm... should include the other
bitch sometime). No, I am not swearing (see dictionary reference for
"bitch" if you are uncertain; in particular, see the K9
version). Should my website get censored? The subjects in question
don't mind or understand...

I think the issue, for the general case (some cultures may be
different), isn't so much "seeing the naked body is bad", rather,
seeing pictures that present the body as a sex item is seen as bad.
There is a fine line between the two, people will have different
opinions.
-- 
Brian May <bam@debian.org>



Reply to: