Re: package rejection
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004, Kevin Mark wrote:
> 1) dfsg-free
Not a condition for acceptance in non-free. But then, that ain't Debian, so
your point stands.
> 2) can not be sexist
> 3) has to be able to be mirrored by all mirrors based on the laws of the
> location of the server
> 4) can not offend someone's religion
> 5) must be able to be installed by minors
> 6) can not be off-color sexually or culturally
The only other real condition is:
2) is acceptable to one of the ftp-masters.
So ask one of them directly.
> also, does anyone know of any other packages that never got in and the
> reasons?
dvdcss code, and some other MPAA bait never did, I think.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
Reply to: