Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:18:16 +0100, David Weinehall <email@example.com> said:
> While being all for that series of pictures (nature is beautiful), I
> find the package pretty meaningless anyway, so I don't see the point
> of including it in Debian in the first place. I do, however, see
> some relevance to the discussions.
It is a CPU monitor. I have three different things running
that can show CPU usage -- gkrellm, wmcpu and some multi-function
wm-monitor whose name escapes me. I happen to have all the cpu
monitors I can use, and I have selected these three out of a list.
I am not so sanguine as to assume that my choices would be
enough for everyone else, and try and impose my selection on
others. At least one user has expressed interest in the package on
this very list.
Well begun is half done. Aristotle
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C