Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 06:18:35PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow <email@example.com> wrote:
> Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 04:01:06AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >> Then, Disk 1 (which is very full-featured, after all) can be
> >> passed out where ever and to who ever, without any fear of
> >> possible problems.
> > Hard-coding a list of "unacceptable" packages into the CD building scripts
> > is a waste of time, because the location of a package on a CD set is
> > primarily determined by its importance to the system and by its popularity.
> > Most of these packages are in danger of ending up on the first CD any time
> > soon -- and, if they were, why should we be overriding the overwhelming
> > preferences expressed by our users just to pander to the childish
> > sensibilities of people who *aren't* our users?
> Even worse with dvd images where nearly everything is on disc1.
Are you kidding ? disc 2 is almost as big as disc 1. And with 2 discs,
you get no source, this is ridiculous. We should take the advantage of
the space available on a DVD to provide binary AND source of the
packages we put on a DVD.