Re: binary NMUs and version numbers
* Andreas Barth (aba@not.so.argh.org) [041128 13:45]:
> * Scott James Remnant (scott@netsplit.com) [041128 13:35]:
> > I don't think that's enough time.
> Well, I disagree - but, neither of us two have definite proof. It might
> perhaps be good if somebody else gives his opinion.
After some discussion with other people on IRC, it seems that the
general opinion is to use the +b-way (which doesn't make me agree on
that, but well, that's not required :). So, unless somebody else
objects, I think that's the way to go now.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Reply to: