[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Finding an improved release process.



On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 01:34:09PM +1100, alexeijh@westnet.com.au wrote:
> People often suggest running testing or unstable. "It's just as stable as any 
> distro". I have never agreed with this. The reason for this is that neither 
> are engineered or intended for being an end product. 

This is an improper definition of 'stable'. It doesn't mean
'reliable', it means 'not changing'. The important feature of a stable
release is that it stays the same.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: