Re: {Spam? 4} Re: murphy is listed on spamcop
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 04:16:23PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Nov 25, paddy <paddy@panici.net> wrote:
>
> > But I expect you already know that.
> > http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkblock&ip=146.82.138.6
> Yes. And people who use spamcop to refuse mail get what they deserve.
Yes, I thought the news might get a reception something like that.
FWIW we don't bounce spam and we don't use spamcop to refuse it, but
we do use spamcop in scoring it, so I'm interested in learning about
the history of the problem. The very fact that I can see that spamcop
repeatedly lists murphy, suggests to me that there is something very
wrong at their end. A quick google suggests that massive threads on
the subject have taken place in the past. I don't want to have trawl
through those if I can avoid it. Any pointers?
Regards,
Paddy
--
Perl 6 will give you the big knob. -- Larry Wall
Reply to: