Re: about volatile.d.o/n

[paddy <paddy@panici.net>]

On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 04:29:37PM +0100, paddy wrote:
> Virus definition updates fit in the 'undesirable' category.  Thats not
> to say some database can't be packaged.  Here's a couple of references:
> 
> 184882DD97@murphy.debian.org
> 1B6482DEA2@murphy.debian.org
> 
> (I'll post a reply with the ml archive web urls, in a hurry just now)

Unless, of course I forget, can't find them or simply can't be bothered ;)

  http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/09/msg01272.html
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/10/msg00605.html

Having tried to find these in the l.d.o web search interface, I now 
realise just how poor a form of reference they turn out to be.  

Apologies.

Readers of the clam lists will be also be aware of stuff like:

  http://lists.clamav.net/lurker/message/20040813.111719.56a73be0.en.html

as well other threads detailing the already significant distribution 
infrastructure of ClamAV, and looking for ways to make it faster.

Regards,
Paddy