Re: about volatile.d.o/n
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 04:29:37PM +0100, paddy wrote:
> Virus definition updates fit in the 'undesirable' category. Thats not
> to say some database can't be packaged. Here's a couple of references:
> (I'll post a reply with the ml archive web urls, in a hurry just now)
Unless, of course I forget, can't find them or simply can't be bothered ;)
Having tried to find these in the l.d.o web search interface, I now
realise just how poor a form of reference they turn out to be.
Readers of the clam lists will be also be aware of stuff like:
as well other threads detailing the already significant distribution
infrastructure of ClamAV, and looking for ways to make it faster.