[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: about volatile.d.o/n



On Friday 08 October 2004 11:51 am, Andreas Barth wrote:
> - volatile is not "just another place" for backports, but should only
>   contain changes to stable programs that are necessary to keep them
>   functional;

  I generally have to resort to backports or unstable when installing Debian 
on recent hardware, because we don't update hardware drivers in stable.  
Would the kernel and X be candidates for volatile?

  Daniel

-- 
/------------------- Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org> ------------------\
|         "Of course you can't see the guards.  They DON'T EXIST!"          |
|         "Oh my god, we're surrounded!" "Run away, run away!"              |
|          -- Fluble                                                        |
\---------------- The Turtle Moves! -- http://www.lspace.org ---------------/

Attachment: pgpb_se0HbSLZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: