[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: about volatile.d.o/n

On Fri, 08 Oct 2004, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Henning Makholm wrote:
> > Scripsit Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
> >> Some things are not so obvious:
> > Should volatile include updates of packages such as debian-keyring?
> debian-keyring?  Absolutely.  Out-of-date versions of this are
> tediously useless.

However, there are problems with updating the debian-keyring, and
deleted signatures and the ilk will keep files from being verifiable
if someone wants to check signatures on them. [I haven't made up my
mind if this is a good thing or not... but...]

Note as well, that you can trivially get the updated debian keyring by
pointing gpg at keyring.debian.org.

Don Armstrong

For a moment, nothing happened. Then, after a second or so, nothing
continued to happen.
 -- Douglas Adams

http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: