Re: Updating scanners and filters in Debian stable (3.1)
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:26:40PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 08:59:22PM +0100, paddy wrote:
> > How would one decide which features to backport, and which not?
> The ones that the maintainer of the package decides is the best for
> keeping the package which will update in stable usable, as long as the
> packages is created against stable, is complying the policy created for such a
> repository and everything is consistant.
Maintainer decides subject to archive policy seems reasonable enough.
I fear though that my earlier suggestion of a feed into proposed-updates
would run up against policy for the stable archives. If such a feed were felt to
be desirable then compromises necessary to achieve that might be a consideration.
> The user might decide to use or not to use such a repository, but for the
> interest of the users, it might be better than leave them with 2.20 in woody
> or having to refer to backports.org, which is not having such a release
> Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org
> Unix SysAdm|Linux User #66350|Debian Developer|2.4.27|Helsinki Finland
> GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69
> I'll see my lawyer about this as soon as he graduates from law school!
> --Rufus T. Firefly (Duck Soup)
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org