Re: possible mass bug filing: spamassassin 3
El jue, 07-10-2004 a las 09:52 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen escribió:
> * Duncan Findlay
>
> | On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 06:43:47PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> | > * martin f krafft
> | >
> | > | What do you think?
> | >
> | > API changed generally means you bump soname. Why not for SA as well.
> | >
> | > Also, SA3 is useless, as it eats about half a gig of RAM on my
> | > system. Per child.
> |
> | Umm... I'd like to see that....
>
> 7122 root 15 0 660m 332m 4692 D 0.0 43.8 8:18.64 spamd
> 7123 nobody 15 0 287m 257m 4692 D 0.0 34.0 0:17.01 spamd
>
> | Furthermore, you should use the -m option to limit the number of
> | children to something sane, like 5 or so.
>
> This is per child, as I wrote.
For me sa work well:
ii spamassassin 3.0.0-1 Perl-based spam filter using text
analysis
emilio@ellugar:~$ ps axum | grep spam
0:00 /usr/sbin/spamd --port 7830 --local --daemonize
emilio 5160 0.2 5.0 28352 25972 ? - 13:00 0:38 spamd
child
emilio 5161 0.0 5.1 28872 26408 ? - 13:00 0:04 spamd
child
emilio 5162 0.0 5.0 28612 26252 ? - 13:00 0:04 spamd
child
emilio 5163 0.0 5.0 28344 25924 ? - 13:00 0:03 spamd
child
emilio 5164 0.0 5.0 28744 26308 ? - 13:00 0:04 spamd
child
emilio 5810 0.0 0.1 2184 768 pts/0 - 16:39 0:00 grep spam
Can you give some steps to reproduce such memory comsuption.
Regards,
Emilio
Reply to: