[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: possible mass bug filing: spamassassin 3



El jue, 07-10-2004 a las 09:52 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen escribió:
> * Duncan Findlay 
> 
> | On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 06:43:47PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> | > * martin f krafft 
> | > 
> | > | What do you think?
> | > 
> | > API changed generally means you bump soname.  Why not for SA as well. 
> | > 
> | > Also, SA3 is useless, as it eats about half a gig of RAM on my
> | > system.  Per child.
> | 
> | Umm... I'd like to see that....
> 
> 7122 root      15   0  660m 332m 4692 D  0.0 43.8   8:18.64 spamd
> 7123 nobody    15   0  287m 257m 4692 D  0.0 34.0   0:17.01 spamd
> 
> | Furthermore, you should use the -m option to limit the number of
> | children to something sane, like 5 or so.
> 
> This is per child, as I wrote.

For me sa work well:

ii  spamassassin   3.0.0-1        Perl-based spam filter using text
analysis
emilio@ellugar:~$ ps axum | grep spam
0:00 /usr/sbin/spamd --port 7830 --local --daemonize
emilio    5160  0.2  5.0 28352 25972 ?       -    13:00   0:38 spamd
child
emilio    5161  0.0  5.1 28872 26408 ?       -    13:00   0:04 spamd
child
emilio    5162  0.0  5.0 28612 26252 ?       -    13:00   0:04 spamd
child
emilio    5163  0.0  5.0 28344 25924 ?       -    13:00   0:03 spamd
child
emilio    5164  0.0  5.0 28744 26308 ?       -    13:00   0:04 spamd
child
emilio    5810  0.0  0.1  2184  768 pts/0    -    16:39   0:00 grep spam

Can you give some steps to reproduce such memory comsuption.

Regards, 

Emilio



Reply to: