Re: possible mass bug filing: spamassassin 3
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 08:46:04PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>
> Well, I'm not at all convinced this is so good. Didn't the RMs say
> something about 'no major new upstream releases', in order to be able to
> ship sarge this year?
2.64-1 is in testing. since sa3 has RCs, it will not get into sarge, at least
not until the problems are solved.
> In addition to the enormous amount of reports of sa3 taken down systems,
> or causing mail loss, by people who I regard as pretty clueful[1], I
> think it's pretty obvious it would be a very bad move to let sa3 into
> sarge. sa3 is IMNSHO a sarge+1, aka etch project.
And I have been running it ever since beta1 in a 512GB PII-350 and my mail has
been going thru without much problems (right now, version=3.0.0-pre4).
data 11713 0.0 0.1 20392 716 ? S Aug05 0:05 ./spamd
--socketpath=/home/data/sa/spamd.sock -L -d -m 5
J
--
Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org
Unix SysAdm|Linux User #66350|Debian Developer|2.4.27|Helsinki Finland
GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69
Tell me, Mr. Anderson, what good is a phone call when you are unable to
speak?
--Agent Smith (The Matrix)
Reply to: