Re: should udev be mandatory?
mdz@debian.org wrote:
>> Unless it's fixed (and the author said repeatedly that it will not be),
>> it basically cannot work reliably unless most init scripts are
>> redesigned to become dev.d scripts.
>Why most init scripts? What sorts of actions need to be moved from init.d
>to dev.d? Creation of device nodes? Or something else?
Every script which accesses a device in /dev/ needs either to be moved
to dev.d or patched to wait for device creation.
--
ciao,
Marco
Reply to: