Re: should udev be mandatory?
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 10:31:06AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> mdz@debian.org wrote:
>
> >> Unless it's fixed (and the author said repeatedly that it will not be),
> >> it basically cannot work reliably unless most init scripts are
> >> redesigned to become dev.d scripts.
> >Why most init scripts? What sorts of actions need to be moved from init.d
> >to dev.d? Creation of device nodes? Or something else?
> Every script which accesses a device in /dev/ needs either to be moved
> to dev.d or patched to wait for device creation.
Does this apply to _all_ devices, even /dev/null and the like?
--
- mdz
Reply to: