On Wednesday 15 September 2004 20:09, martin f krafft wrote: > rbl.debian.org > i only listed those that sent spam, iteratively decreasing the > netmask to fuse networks over a period of a couple of weeks. > > Have better suggestions? I am sick and tired because literally 99% > of the spam I see comes through master and gluck. what about using greylisting for those nets on the rbl list? If anyone has fundamental information why not to use greylisting, please speak up. :) Cheers Arne -- Arne Götje (高盛華) <20030910antispam@gmx.net> (Spam catcher. Address might change in future!) PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/685D1E8C Fingerprint: 2056 F6B7 DEA8 B478 311F 1C34 6E9F D06E 685D 1E8C Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred.
Attachment:
pgpMINHqruNS4.pgp
Description: PGP signature