also sprach Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> [2004.09.15.1319 +0200]: > I agree that we need a way to filter spam sent to @debian.org and > @packages.debian.org addresses, but I do not believe that local > lists are the solution, because they would quickly become out of > date. rbl.debian.org > (BTW, you only listed a small part of chinanet, and not all > chinanet regions are black hat. SBL+XBL should cover all major > sources.) i only listed those that sent spam, iteratively decreasing the netmask to fuse networks over a period of a couple of weeks. also sprach Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2004.09.15.1353 +0200]: > You are aware that Chine isn't exactly your average capitalist > country where you're free to pick any ISP you want? Sure, but why should that allow them to host spammers? I realise this argument is getting nowhere... Have better suggestions? I am sick and tired because literally 99% of the spam I see comes through master and gluck. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <email@example.com> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Description: Digital signature