On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 12:10:22AM +1000, Paul Hampson wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 09:29:14PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Kevin B. McCarty: > > > > Recall that "it's" is a contraction for "it is" or "it has", and any other > > > use (e.g. as a possessive) is not grammatically correct English. > > > Hypothetical examples: > > > > - XMMS is cool. It's one of the best ... [correct, "It is"] > > > - XMMS is cool. It's been rated highly ... [correct, "It has"] > > > - XMMS is cool. It's features include ... [wrong] > > > - XMMS is cool. Its features include ... [correct, possessive] > > > > Using "it's" and "its" correctly is in your best interest, since incorrect > > > usage may cause someone browsing the package descriptions to have a bad > > > first impression of that package. > > > If this is really important, lintian could enforce a style guide that > > prohibts "it's" altogether, always requiring the spelled-out versions. > > (While we are at it, "e.g." and "i.e." are good candidates for a ban, > > too. 8-) > > In that direction, we could (as I nearly suggested last week) ban all > personal pronouns to prevent displaying any gender bias, while not > putting the weight of Debian's collective English grammar behind any ^^^^^^^^^^ Debian is a collective? Seven of nine would be proud! Then again, if Debian becomes the 'universal' operating system, 'assimilation' would be one way to ensure that! -Kev > particular gender-neutral personal singular pronoun. -- (__) (oo) /------\/ / | || * /\---/\ ~~ ~~ ...."Have you mooed today?"...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature