[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Accepted mindi-partimagehack 0.6.2-2.1 (i386 source)

On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 04:52:13PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> Amaya Rodrigo Sastre wrote:
> > mindi-partimagehack (0.6.2-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
> >   * NMU to fix libraries fuckup.
> Please, people, can we keep changelog entries more or less G-rated?

What's not G-rated about that?

Oh, you mean C-rated?

> You can curse bugs all you want on IRC, but remember that stuff like 
> this gets seen by important people who may want to judge Debian based on 
> things like this.

If people judge the whole of Debian on the way I express myself about
errors I make while doing some stuff in my spare time, I'd rather not
receive bug reports from them. The best way to avoid that is to not have
them as our users.

I'd like to decide how I express myself in my bug reports for myself
rather than considering about what some hypothetical person might think
about it, thank you very much.

> And it's really not worth it, heh.

Who's to say?

> I've recently found myself censoring some of Zephaniah Hull's angsty gpm 
> changelog entries...

'Correcting' them? In what way?

     smog  |   bricks
 AIR  --  mud  -- FIRE
soda water |   tequila
 -- with thanks to fortune

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: