Re: Bug#268643: ITP: libasm-java -- Java bytecode manipulation framework

[Marcus Crafter <crafterm@managesoft.com>]

Hi Steinar,

Thanks for that. Will update appropriately.

Cheers,

Marcus

On Sat, 2004-08-28 at 16:55, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 04:13:33PM +0200, Marcus Crafter wrote:
> >  ASM offers similar functionalities as BCEL or SERP, but is much more
> >  smaller (25KB instead of 350KB for BCEL and 150KB for SERP) and faster
> 
> s/ more//
> 
> >  than these tools (the overhead of a load time class transformation is of
> >  the order of 60% with ASM, 700% or more with BCEL, and 1100% or more with
> >  SERP). Indeed ASM was designed to be used in a dynamic and static way and was
> 
> s/Indeed // (and what does "in a dynamic and static way" mean? "both
> dynamically and statically"?)
> 
> >  therefore designed and implemented to be as small and as fast as possible.
> 
> Otherwise looks OK.
> 
> /* Steinar */
> -- 
> Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
-- 
        .....
     ,,$$$$$$$$$,      Marcus Crafter
    ;$'      '$$$$:    Computer Systems Engineer
    $:         $$$$:   ManageSoft Corporation
     $       o_)$$$:   Frankfurt am Main, Germany
     ;$,    _/\ &&:'
       '     /( &&&
           \_&&&&'
          &&&&.
    &&&&&&&: