Re: Bug#268643: ITP: libasm-java -- Java bytecode manipulation framework
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 04:13:33PM +0200, Marcus Crafter wrote:
> ASM offers similar functionalities as BCEL or SERP, but is much more
> smaller (25KB instead of 350KB for BCEL and 150KB for SERP) and faster
s/ more//
> than these tools (the overhead of a load time class transformation is of
> the order of 60% with ASM, 700% or more with BCEL, and 1100% or more with
> SERP). Indeed ASM was designed to be used in a dynamic and static way and was
s/Indeed // (and what does "in a dynamic and static way" mean? "both
dynamically and statically"?)
> therefore designed and implemented to be as small and as fast as possible.
Otherwise looks OK.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
Reply to: