Le mercredi 25 août 2004 à 08:29 -0700, Matt Zimmerman a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 10:27:47AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > > Yes, but I cannot see any recent (within the last year and half) installation > > of woody where users did not install a recent version of mozilla, instead > > of the pre-1.0. So in some cases, secteam efforts are at least a waste of time. > > In those cases that time would be better used in packaging a well-done major > > upgrade. Users would be more satisfied, I think. > > That well-done major upgrade is in progress, and its name is "sarge". Fixes > for woody would be great, but despite a lot of discussion on the subject, no > one is putting real effort into it. This is a big project, and the security > team is already overloaded. There are already many developers involved in backports, so I don't see how this could be a problem of manpower. The only missing thing is an infrastructure to make these backports somehow approved by the security team, and autobuilt. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org `. `' joss@debian.org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=