On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 04:45:54PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:30:43 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar <jeroen@wolffelaar.nl> said: > > I agree, and since the difference between 1 and 2 is not relevant > > for Sarge, I propose option '1.5': > It is, since I do not think we should be special casing a > policy excemption for these packages. > >> Leave the GNUstep files as it is for Sarge, and discuss whether > >> they need to be changed after Sarge is released > > To be implemented by downgrading the relevant bug to important. > "serious". It is still a policy violation. Quite. I have a list of gnustep packages to review for possible tagging sarge-ignore. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature