[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Conflicts between FHS and GnuStep

On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 04:45:54PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:30:43 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar <jeroen@wolffelaar.nl> said: 

> > I agree, and since the difference between 1 and 2 is not relevant
> > for Sarge, I propose option '1.5':

> 	It is, since I do not think we should be special casing a
>  policy excemption for these packages.

> >> Leave the GNUstep files as it is for Sarge, and discuss whether
> >> they need to be changed after Sarge is released

> > To be implemented by downgrading the relevant bug to important.

> 	"serious". It is still a policy violation.


I have a list of gnustep packages to review for possible tagging

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: