Re: Conflicts between FHS and GnuStep (was: Bug#256141: addresses: GNUstep Mass Bug Breaks Policy Section 9.1.1)
* Andreas Barth wrote:
> I can see different ways out (order has nothing to do with
> 1. Agree that
> | This is where all of the system's general-use include files for the C
> | and C++ programming languages should be placed.
> doesn't match GNUstep files, and leave everything as is.
> 2. Accept the location of GNUstep files as an exception for sarge, and
> change that post-sarge.
> 3. make a lot of changes to GNUStep in the last minute
> 4. drop GNUStep from sarge
I hope the RMs decide for 2. As for post sarge: I was told, that there is a
discusion on gnustep-discuss going on, which tries to examine the possibility
to add to gnustep-make the ability to install into FHS compliant paths.
Haven't followed that though, so perhaps someone more involved in gnustep can
elaborate on this.
Fingerprint: A46A 753F AEDC 2C01 BE6E F6DB 97E0 3309 9FD6 E3E6