Re: Debconf doesn't scale well -- suggestion

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Debconf doesn't scale well -- suggestion
From: Roger Leigh <rleigh@whinlatter.ukfsn.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 23:23:22 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 874qmxtpnp.fsf@whinlatter.whinlatter.ukfsn.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040820201841.GB28707@moregruel.net> (Steve Greenland's message of "Fri, 20 Aug 2004 15:18:41 -0500")
References: <[🔎] opsc070fwrpy1bnz@stoptrick.de> <[🔎] 20040820161702.GH6620@downhill.at.eu.org> <[🔎] 20040820201841.GB28707@moregruel.net>

Steve Greenland <steveg@moregruel.net> writes:

> On 20-Aug-04, 11:17 (CDT), Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org> wrote: 
>> Going back is possible if the respective maintainer-srcipt supports
>> it. In the Dialog-frontend the respective button is labeled <Cancel>
>
> Because of course "Cancel" is obviously "Back", and not "End
> configuration".
>
> That's a *really* bad design choice.

dialog has a --cancel-label option.  "--cancel-label Back" would fix
this.


-- 
Roger Leigh

                Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
                GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Debconf doesn't scale well -- suggestion
  - From: Steve Greenland <steveg@moregruel.net>
- Re: Debconf doesn't scale well -- suggestion
  - From: Per Olofsson <pelle@dsv.su.se>

References:
- Debconf doesn't scale well -- suggestion
  - From: Daniel Haude <dunno@stoptrick.com>
- Re: Debconf doesn't scale well -- suggestion
  - From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>
- Re: Debconf doesn't scale well -- suggestion
  - From: Steve Greenland <steveg@moregruel.net>

Prev by Date: Re: PROPOSAL to sarge+1 - Split main in sub-repositories
Next by Date: Re: PROPOSAL to sarge+1 - Split main in sub-repositories
Previous by thread: Re: Debconf doesn't scale well -- suggestion
Next by thread: Re: Debconf doesn't scale well -- suggestion
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread