Re: KDE package descriptions
Peter Lundqvist <peterl@Update.UU.SE> writes:
> Is there really a need to describe KDE at all except in meta-packages?
>
> I find white noise in package descriptions very anoying since I read them
> in my 80x25 xterm using apt-cache show. Wouldn't it be better to refer to
> another package for description of KDE itself?
I rather agree, especially in this case, as the KDE blurb in quesiton
seems more like frothy marketing-speak than a real description.
If retained, it should at least go at the end.
[I've gotten the impression that KDE upstream is extremely touchy
about their "image" though, so tread carefully... :-/ ]
-Miles
--
`The suburb is an obsolete and contradictory form of human settlement'
Reply to: