[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: KDE package descriptions

Peter Lundqvist <peterl@Update.UU.SE> writes:
> Is there really a need to describe KDE at all except in meta-packages?
> I find white noise in package descriptions very anoying since I read them
> in my 80x25 xterm using apt-cache show. Wouldn't it be better to refer to
> another package for description of KDE itself?

I rather agree, especially in this case, as the KDE blurb in quesiton
seems more like frothy marketing-speak than a real description.
If retained, it should at least go at the end.

[I've gotten the impression that KDE upstream is extremely touchy
about their "image" though, so tread carefully... :-/ ]

`The suburb is an obsolete and contradictory form of human settlement'

Reply to: