Re: Architecture independent binaries and building from source

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Architecture independent binaries and building from source
From: Matthias Urlichs <smurf@smurf.noris.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:44:31 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] pan.2004.08.12.07.44.31.301417@smurf.noris.de>
References: <[🔎] 1092131450.13104.19.camel@atari.stigge.org> <[🔎] 20040810172958.GA9775@seanius.net> <[🔎] 20040810181427.GB20520@www.lobefin.net> <[🔎] 200408101711.18494.sjackman@telus.net> <[🔎] 20040811202106.GA3611@tintin> <[🔎] 20040811213719.GA92809@spawn.mnemosyne-consulting.com>

Hi, Joel Baker wrote:

> A) 1) Saving time on the autobuilders (potentially lots of it), and

It only saves time on one autobuilder; all others still process the
package. Plus, that autobuilder will be an architecture for which there
definitely is no shortage of CPU power...

-- 
Matthias Urlichs

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Architecture independent binaries and building from source
  - From: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
- Re: Architecture independent binaries and building from source
  - From: sean finney <seanius@debian.org>
- Re: Architecture independent binaries and building from source
  - From: Stephen Gran <sgran@debian.org>
- Re: Architecture independent binaries and building from source
  - From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@telus.net>
- Re: Architecture independent binaries and building from source
  - From: Nicolas Boullis <nboullis@debian.org>
- Re: Architecture independent binaries and building from source
  - From: Joel Baker <fenton@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: 0-day NMUs [Was: Bug-Squashing Week, August 16th - 22th]
Next by Date: Re: No libtiff transition for sarge
Previous by thread: Re: Architecture independent binaries and building from source
Next by thread: Re: Architecture independent binaries and building from source
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread