On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 22:41 +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote: > Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org> writes: > > > On 2004-08-09 Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote: > >> Hi, > > > >> in short (full rephrase below) I propose the following change to > >> debian-policy: > > > >> option 1: Make build-arch and build-indep targets mandatory in > >> debian/rules > > > >> or > > > >> option 2: Add an optional "Build-Targets" line to debian/control. > > [...] > >> Comments, ideas, opionion? > > > > Are you familiar with #218893, which is basically identical to your > > Option 2? The most important thing included there is that dpkg > > maintainance (I had asked Scott James Remnant[1] on IRC) would rather > > see autodetection of availabilty of optional targets with > > make -f debian/rules -pn | grep '^build-arch:' > > cu andreas > > > That won't work with systems like CDBS. > Why not? -pn should process includes fwir. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part