Re: is boost's build starved on mips-hawking?
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 03:40:51PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 03:04:42PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 08:31:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > * Domenico Andreoli (email@example.com) wrote:
> > > > anybody has news from mips buildd hawking? it has been hanging for some
> > > > days on glibc and i suspect something is waiting for human intervention.
> > >
> > > This might be old news, but hawking does appear to be chugging along
> > > doing something. It appears that r5k is doing it's thing too. I'm
> > > guessing 'somebody' did 'something'. :)
> > >
> > then i'm not understanding why  continues to list glibc and boost at
> > the top but none of them actually is built. or somebody (is you?) did
> > something that is still not visible from buildd.debian.org?
> The build failed, and the state remains at Building until someone
> examines the build log and sets the state to Failed. See the log at
ah! i was not aware of this manual passage, it makes a lot more sense
than the busted ftp thesis of Stephen :)) thank Daniel
if it can be of help, that build failed because of a broken symlink in
g++-3.3 1:3.3.4-4 (bug #260514) which has been fixed in -5.
now if some kind soul could set the boost state back to Failed and let
it have another chance of being built...
-----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50