Re: libtiff status: only 21 to go
Quoting Steve Langasek <email@example.com>:
> Depending on the order in which the libraries are loaded, having one lib
> with versioned symbols and one without loaded into memory can still be a
> But I don't think that's much of an issue when looking at the build
> dependencies, here. I seem to recall, though, that pure-virtual
> build-deps (as libtiff-dev is) are usually considered bad form?
It works fine when a virtual package is provided by one only
real package, which is the case with libtiff-dev.