Re: Bug#260222: ITP: libmqueue -- POSIX message queues library for Linux
At Fri, 23 Jul 2004 16:28:56 +0200,
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 07:05:35PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > I don't understand why you think it's bad idea. Until glibc included
> > mqueue, it was existed as separated library. AFAIK, there is no
> > application that use mqueue library in main. This means user links
> > mqueue library with his application with his hand.
> glibc got mqueue support when the kernel got it. SLES9 and RHEL4 will
> have it so applications will start to use it. But given glibc on sarge
> is totally outdated anyway there will probably be little chance to run
> recent 3rd-party binaries on sarge anyway.
POSIX message queue has been known since POSIX standardized them in
1996, but AFAIK there's no major 3rd-party binaries which use mqueue.
If you know, please tell me, we enable mqueue at boot up time in
default on 2.6 kernel after sarge.
I agree with your argument about outdating glibc. Regarding both
SLES9 and RHEL4, I think accelerating the release interval makes more
So I'm OK with Mattia's intension.