Re: MPlayer
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 02:23:40PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 01:49:57AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > It expires in October anyway.
>
> Don't US patents last 20 years now? Or does that only apply to patents
> filed / approved / whatever after the date of the change?
Indeed. However, this patent was owned by a company which has recently
been acquired by another one. That new company is filing suits, the
other wasn't.
A company being acquired by another (luckily) doesn't renew patent
terms. This patent expires in October.
> > Unless Debian is actually served with a cease-and-desist and the claim
> > looks legitimate, no bug-filing should happen.
>
> I'm happy to cede to your authority. But this is a different way of
> handling a patent threat than was applied for the LZW patent. Or did Debian
> receive such an order in the LZW case?
No, but the term in which LZW patents could be filed was much longer.
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
Reply to:
- References:
- MPlayer
- From: Lior Kaplan <webmaster@guides.co.il>
- Re: MPlayer
- From: William Ballard <40711.nospam@comcast.net>
- Re: MPlayer
- From: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@debian.org>
- Re: MPlayer
- From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>
- Re: MPlayer
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: MPlayer
- From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>
- Re: MPlayer
- From: Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@vitelus.com>
- Re: MPlayer
- From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>
- Re: MPlayer
- From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
- Re: MPlayer
- From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>