Re: MPlayer
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 01:49:57AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 10:33:49AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 01:26:34PM -0700, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 01:08:42AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > > > What litigation is current for infringing use of a patent related the JPEG
> > > > standard?
> > >
> > > http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/04/23/0138200&tid=155&tid=152&tid=123
> >
> > Yeehah, it's GIF all over again. Goat f**kers.
> >
> > Oh, what fun and games to file all the bugs to get the code removed for a
> > few years.
>
> It expires in October anyway.
Don't US patents last 20 years now? Or does that only apply to patents
filed / approved / whatever after the date of the change?
> Unless Debian is actually served with a cease-and-desist and the claim
> looks legitimate, no bug-filing should happen.
I'm happy to cede to your authority. But this is a different way of
handling a patent threat than was applied for the LZW patent. Or did Debian
receive such an order in the LZW case?
- Matt
Reply to:
- References:
- MPlayer
- From: Lior Kaplan <webmaster@guides.co.il>
- Re: MPlayer
- From: William Ballard <40711.nospam@comcast.net>
- Re: MPlayer
- From: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@debian.org>
- Re: MPlayer
- From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>
- Re: MPlayer
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: MPlayer
- From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>
- Re: MPlayer
- From: Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@vitelus.com>
- Re: MPlayer
- From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>
- Re: MPlayer
- From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>