[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: -= PROPOSAL =- Release sarge with amd64



Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:

> * Raul Miller (moth@debian.org) wrote:
>> > > The no-cost linux downloads from kx.com and jsoftware.com are the ones
>> > > I'm most concerned about (in that order).
>> 
>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 10:06:23PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> > Alright, perhaps we can get some of the debian-amd64 folks to give it a
>> > whirl and see if they can't figure something out about it.  Possibly
>> > even help find a way to make them run.  I may try and look at these
>> > tommorow myself too.
>> > 
>> > How about it folks?
>> 
>> Note that these are binaries, so porting them is out.  However, they
>> run fine on 32bit intel LSB systems.
>
> Well, certainly, I had assumed that to be the case.
>
>> If you're going to this effort anyways: there's a known bug in
>> k (mentioned in the release notes, but possible to overlook).
>> The workaround is to turn on backing store in the x server.
>
> Hmm, alright.
>
>> Final note: there's a gpl'd version of a precursor to k (by the same
>> author) at www.aplusdev.org.  It's no where near as efficient, nor as
>> capable, and I'll package it up eventually if no one else gets around to
>> it, but that might be more to someone's taste.  [It's four times as big,
>> an order of magnitude slower, and way less functional, and requires a
>> special font to be useful at all, so you have to run it in an x terminal
>> with that font, just to read the code.  But the license is right.]
>
> That's, erm, interesting.  My intent wasn't to try to actually port the
> package but just try to get the binary running using ia32-libs.  Then,
> if that didn't work right off, to try to figure out what libraries it's
> missing (if that's the case) or what the problem is in general.  The
> next step would be to see if we can then resolve those problems.  I have
> to admit that I didn't realize one of the binaries had X calls...  I
> expect that will make it more difficult.  Perhaps I missed it, but were
> there X calls in the function list you provided previously?
>
> 	Stephen

mrvn@dual:~% ls /emul/ia32-linux/usr/X11R6/lib
X11/           libXTrap.so.6@   libXi.so.6.0      libXt.so.6@
libGL.so.1@    libXTrap.so.6.4  libXmu.so.6@      libXt.so.6.0
libGL.so.1.2   libXaw.so.7@     libXmu.so.6.2     libXtst.so.6@
libGLU.so.1@   libXaw.so.7.0    libXmuu.so.1@     libXtst.so.6.1
libGLU.so.1.3  libXaw3d.so.6@   libXmuu.so.1.0    libdps.so.1@
libICE.so.6@   libXaw3d.so.6.1  libXp.so.6@       libdps.so.1.0
libICE.so.6.3  libXext.so.6@    libXp.so.6.2      libdpstk.so.1@
libSM.so.6@    libXext.so.6.4   libXpm.so.4@      libdpstk.so.1.0
libSM.so.6.0   libXft.so.1@     libXpm.so.4.11    libpsres.so.1@
libX11.so.6@   libXft.so.1.1    libXrandr.so.2@   libpsres.so.1.0
libX11.so.6.2  libXi.so.6@      libXrandr.so.2.0

MfG
        Goswin



Reply to: