also sprach Andrew Suffield <email@example.com> [2004.06.29.1357 +0200]: > That's a completely arse-backwards approach to security. All that > accomplishes is to make sure that the people who break your system > know what they're doing. That just makes things worse. You're > confusing security and cryptography. So what's a better one? What is a better approach to security than to make it progressively harder for attackers? Don't worry, this already includes policy and threat models and all the like. > There's no such thing as a trustworthy company. You're funny. > > Or should Debian just continue to be second-grade when it comes to > > security. > > False dilemma. No, valid point. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <firstname.lastname@example.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Description: Digital signature