On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:19:31PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava scribbled: > On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 21:02:28 +0200, Josip Rodin <joy@srce.hr> said: > > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 11:27:07PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > >> > The current vote will determine what the majority of voters > >> > think. Hopefully that will be the end of it. > >> > >> Not likely. The last vote determined what 3/4 of the voters > >> thought, and people weren't willing to let that be the end of it. > > > Uh, no, how many times and how many people will have to say that the > > title and description were suboptimal (to put it mildly) before you > > are convinced that the ballot didn't actually match what many voters > > thought? > > And how many times do people have to tell you that people too > lazy or apathetic to read emails sent to them thrice should not be > expected to have a say in the decisions that are made? No matter how > suboptimal the subject was, the full text of the GR was delivered > to you thrice. It was all there on the debian web site. > > You may be comfortable with how lazy and apathetic some > voters are, but do not lay the blame on other people (whine > "the title was just wrong" whine "they made me not pay attention" > whine "the dog ate my ballot") I wanted to stay away from this "discussion", but I just have to ask. What gives YOU, Manoj, the right to judge others and offend them? Was there a GR to that effect or something? I think you owe those who you're offending. and your enigmatic "they" can apply to every one of us (and yes, I voted already) so you better contend yourself and watch your mouth, ok? If somebody resorts to calling names and and offence, it means that person doesn't really have other arguments to support their stance. marek
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature