[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Analysis of the ballot options

Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> wrote:
> * Andrew Suffield (asuffield@debian.org) [040619 15:25]:
>> > [   ] Choice 6: Reaffirm the current SC                [needs 1:1]
> Choice 6 is titled wrong. It's not a reaffirmation of the social
> contract, it's an affirmation of a certain interpretation of the
> social contract. An affirmation of another interpretation of the
> social contract was not allowed to be put on the ballot.

I disagree. The whole mess we are in right now is caused by the fact
that the "current SC" practically did away with other interpretations
of the SC, and therefore choice 6 is not mislabeled.
            cu andreas
NMUs aren't an insult, they're not an attack, and they're
not something to avoid or be ashamed of.
                    Anthony Towns in 2004-02 on debian-devel

Reply to: