Re: Analysis of the ballot options
Andreas Barth <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> * Andrew Suffield (email@example.com) [040619 15:25]:
>> > [ ] Choice 6: Reaffirm the current SC [needs 1:1]
> Choice 6 is titled wrong. It's not a reaffirmation of the social
> contract, it's an affirmation of a certain interpretation of the
> social contract. An affirmation of another interpretation of the
> social contract was not allowed to be put on the ballot.
I disagree. The whole mess we are in right now is caused by the fact
that the "current SC" practically did away with other interpretations
of the SC, and therefore choice 6 is not mislabeled.
NMUs aren't an insult, they're not an attack, and they're
not something to avoid or be ashamed of.
Anthony Towns in 2004-02 on debian-devel