[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Why -rpath is so evil [Re: -rpath and policy?]

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 21:25:16 +0200, martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org> said: 

> also sprach Goswin von Brederlow
> <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> [2004.06.15.2058 +0200]:
>> PS: rpath is evil, all avoid rpath :)

> So can we please add that to the policy?

	Policy generally does not say things like "Do not do things
 that are buggy", since then we would have a huge document. Sounds
 like there are clear cut technical reasons _not_ to  use rpath; that
 using rpath breaks things; surely we do not need policy to tell us
 not to break stuff?

Gravity: What you get when you eat too much and too fast.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Attachment: pgpVaEaAbRgAm.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: