[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [SE/Linux] status / progress report 13jun2004

On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 18:46, Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 05:40:05PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > The alternative to this is to patch dpkg with SE Linux support in the
> > way that rpm has been.  Should I implement the needed functionality in
> > that manner?
> I would suggest that. SE Linux is an exception in that it needs to
> update file system attributes for /any/ installed package. Creating too
> generic solutions to such highly exceptional situations seems overly
> broad to me.

Your suggestion makes sense to me.  DPKG people, what do you think?  I'm happy 
to write the code, but I don't want to write code that will never be 

http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/    Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page

Reply to: