On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 05:40:05PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> The alternative to this is to patch dpkg with SE Linux support in the
> way that rpm has been. Should I implement the needed functionality in
> that manner?
I would suggest that. SE Linux is an exception in that it needs to
update file system attributes for /any/ installed package. Creating too
generic solutions to such highly exceptional situations seems overly
broad to me.
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature