[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [SE/Linux] status / progress report 13jun2004

On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 05:40:05PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> The alternative to this is to patch dpkg with SE Linux support in the
> way that rpm has been.  Should I implement the needed functionality in
> that manner?

I would suggest that. SE Linux is an exception in that it needs to
update file system attributes for /any/ installed package. Creating too
generic solutions to such highly exceptional situations seems overly
broad to me.

     smog  |   bricks
 AIR  --  mud  -- FIRE
soda water |   tequila
 -- with thanks to fortune

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: