[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#252346: dpkg: Breaks the debian-amd64 port

On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 11:14 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:

> * Scott James Remnant (scott@netsplit.com) wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 19:31 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > The decision wasn't yours to make.
> >
> > Fair enough, I've backed out the .22 changes *entirely*.  There is
> > clearly a vast disagreement between the various porters about what is
> > best and even whether the archtable entries are right in the first
> > place.
> Very well.  We'll start a seperate discussion on the debian-amd64 list
> as to what the entries should be and attempt to come up to a consensus.
> Once that's done we can forward you a patch, will that be acceptable?
Yes, please ensure the mail is signed by everyone on the list to
indicate it has been agreed and you're *all* happy with it.

Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: