[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#252346: dpkg: Breaks the debian-amd64 port

On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 19:31 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:

> * Scott James Remnant (scott@netsplit.com) wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 20:50 +0000, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > Please change the name back to amd64 asap and next time consult the
> > > debian-amd64 port mailinglist (and not $RANDOM DD using amd64) before
> > > doing such a drastic change.
> > > 
> > I didn't consult "$RANDOM" developers, I consulted both members of the
> > ftpmaster team and of the port team.  If these people didn't speak for
> > *you*, that is too bad.
> > 
> > In the end, I took a decision based on the problems and facts given to
> > me.
> The decision wasn't yours to make.
Fair enough, I've backed out the .22 changes *entirely*.  There is
clearly a vast disagreement between the various porters about what is
best and even whether the archtable entries are right in the first

Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: