Re: Lost Trust

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Lost Trust
From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 23:53:16 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040601135316.GA28743@cloud.net.au>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040601094335.GE11091@suffields.me.uk>
References: <200405302331.45038.else@austin.rr.com> <20040531143110.GB11678@phunnypharm.org> <20040531213617.GA14887@suffields.me.uk> <[🔎] 20040601074744.GC4362@wonderland.linux.it> <[🔎] 20040601094335.GE11091@suffields.me.uk>

On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 10:43:35AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> Really, you have to wonder why some people are associated with Debian
> at all, given their apparent positiion against the fundamental purpose
> of the project.

Please be aware that there are people in Debian whose opinion differs
from yours and whose opinion is equally valid. It is not necessary for
you to redicule others at every opportunity.

Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Lost Trust
  - From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
- Re: Lost Trust
  - From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal G (was: Proposal - Deferment of Changes from GR 2004-003)
Next by Date: Bug#252101: ITP: gromacs -- [Biology] versatile package to perform molecular dynamics.
Previous by thread: Re: Lost Trust
Next by thread: Re: Lost Trust
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread