Re: Debian / SE/Linux - libselinux1 needs to be set priority "important" or "required"
On Sun, 30 May 2004 20:54, Goswin von Brederlow
> The source package already is required. That means the override file
> on ftp-master changes the priority to optional. The person to talk to
> would be ftp-master. The maintainer should get a mail from linda,
> madison or one of our girls informing him about the override disparity
> and whom to contact on every upload? I suggest contacting him first
> asking why he hasn't talked ftp-master into changing the priority yet.
I receive the email in question and did what it instructed (send email to a
certain address requesting that the change be made). So far nothing has
happened as a result.
It would probably be good for Luke to file a bug report against
On Sun, 30 May 2004 21:06, Florian Weimer <email@example.com> wrote:
> Isn't full SELinux integration a bit risky in the light of Secure
> Computing's patents?
I don't think so.
> How do other distributors deal with this issue? Do they ignore it
SE Linux is included in Fedora Core 2 (boot CD1 and type "linux selinux" at
the boot prompt to install SE Linux). Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 will have
SE Linux included.
PS Luke's email seems broken, I can't send mail to him direct.
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page