On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 05:31:58PM +0200, Stefan Hornburg wrote: > On Fri, 21 May 2004 14:34:28 +0200 > Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> wrote: > > > Stefan Hornburg <racke@linuxia.de> schrieb: > > > > > Hello, fellow developers and timeout maintainer ! > > > > > > Can someone please explain why timeout replaces netatalk in stable !? > > > > The changelog > > http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/t/tct/tct_1.07-9/changelog > > says it: > > > > tct (1.07-6) unstable; urgency=low > > > > * Added proper Conflicts and Replaces against netatalk for timeout. > > Closes: Bug#112219. > > > > Further explanation can therefore be found in > > http://bugs.debian.org/112219. > > Conflicts might makes sense, but Replaces doesn't. I can see no hint in > the package description that timeout supplies netatalk's features. It doesn't have to. <http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces>. -- EARTH smog | bricks AIR -- mud -- FIRE soda water | tequila WATER -- with thanks to fortune
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature