On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 05:31:58PM +0200, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
> On Fri, 21 May 2004 14:34:28 +0200
> Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> wrote:
>
> > Stefan Hornburg <racke@linuxia.de> schrieb:
> >
> > > Hello, fellow developers and timeout maintainer !
> > >
> > > Can someone please explain why timeout replaces netatalk in stable !?
> >
> > The changelog
> > http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/t/tct/tct_1.07-9/changelog
> > says it:
> >
> > tct (1.07-6) unstable; urgency=low
> >
> > * Added proper Conflicts and Replaces against netatalk for timeout.
> > Closes: Bug#112219.
> >
> > Further explanation can therefore be found in
> > http://bugs.debian.org/112219.
>
> Conflicts might makes sense, but Replaces doesn't. I can see no hint in
> the package description that timeout supplies netatalk's features.
It doesn't have to.
<http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces>.
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature