On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 15:25 -0500, Chris Cheney wrote: > On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 08:18:18PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 22:01 -0500, Chris Cheney wrote: > > > > > When is amd64 going to be allowed to go into sid? It has been more or > > > less ready to go into sid since mid Feb and seems to be primarily > > > blocked on the fact that it is not an official Debian port yet. > > > > > I'm not sure amd64 is ready; dpkg support hasn't yet been put in a > > release though it's now in CVS and build-essential hasn't been updated > > with amd64 requirements, and none have been communicated to me. > > > > I outlined what I felt were the necessary steps over a month ago in > > Bug#241689, and haven't seen any feedback from that. > > > Since you are one of the dpkg maintainers can you upload a version with > amd64 support? > As I say above, the patches are in CVS now -- this means they'll be in the next upload. > That solves the first part of the problem you mentioned > in #241689 that you mention you told the user about over a month ago... > Then we are back to needing to get amd64 into sid which you listed as > step 2. > You could continue with steps 3+ while you wait for the ftpmasters -- and prepare an FTP archive somewhere else with packages as you build them. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Description: This is a digitally signed message part