Re: Mass bug filing: Cryptographic protection against modification
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 11:15:04AM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> Still, it is becoming more and more clear to me that the concept of
> applying common sense by way of understanding that they are guidelines, and
> noth a definition, is lost on a lot of folks. So maybe a DFSG amendment IS
> called for, just to force the endless discussions to turn into SOMETHING
> new.
I don't think I like the new trend of "amend the foundation documents to shut
up a few boring threads", though. :) Clearly, that tends to backfire (in
nuclear proportions) ...
--
Glenn Maynard
Reply to: