Re: Mass bug filing: Cryptographic protection against modification
Matthew Garrett schrieb:
> But the GPL is modifiable. The preamble isn't. Yes, it would be nice if
> the preamble was.
This makes it as unfree or free as GFDLed documents.
> We arguably should alter the social contract to say
> "Debian will remain entirely free (except for two or three text files
> that we're required to distribute in order to actually be able to
> distribute any software whatsoever)", but it's not entirely clear how
> that would actually benefit anyone.
While doing so, one could consider if applying the DFSoftwareG to
icons, fonts or whatever makes more sense than applying it to the GPL.
PS: Sorry, gmane doesn't allow me to crosspost.