[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge

Thomas Hood wrote:

> On Sat, 2004-05-01 at 00:41, Glenn Maynard wrote:
>> During the GFDL debates, I lost faith in the FSF with respect to
>> documentation: they appeared willing to compromise documentation freedom
>> readily, if they thought it would further "free programs".  I found that
>> reprehensible.
> I can understand some gift not meeting your standards, but it goes
> much too far to characterize the giver of disappointing gift as
> 'reprehensible'.
>> I wouldn't be surprised if they, too, were trying to redefine
>> "software" to suit their needs.
> Ah, I see.  What is reprehensible is the attempt at deceit!  The FSF
> wants to manipulate how you use this word so that it can fool you into
> accepting its contaminated offerings!  Evil!

Though I can't speak for Glenn, I think you get it.  :-)

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

Reply to: